Legal Opinion
Woodill v. City of Glendale
California Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 10085PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
The judgment is affirmed.
The action is an attack upon certain proceedings taken and completed by the City of Glendale under the Street Improvement Act of 1911, as amended (Stats. 1911, p. 730, chap. 397), followed by the issuance of bonds or warrants as provided in the Bond Act of 1915 (Stats. 1915, p. 1441, chap. 733). The attack is purely collateral,' no single protest or objection of any kind having been made to the city council at any time.
The resolution of intention was in proper form; it was published as required by law and the proper posting was also done. Jurisdiction to carry out…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- In Re East Bay Etc. Water Bonds of 1925California Supreme Court · 1925
- Watkinson v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Garibaldi v. City of Daly CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Mathes v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- V. R. Dennis Construction Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Crawford v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Crawford v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.