Legal Opinion

Rider v. City of San Diego

California Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1998No. S058956PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In this case, we consider the validity of a financing plan under which a joint powers agency will issue bonds, use the bond proceeds to construct a capital improvement, and lease that improvement to a city. We conclude that the voter approval requirements that would apply if the city issued the bonds do not, by their terms, apply to the debts of a joint powers agency, and the city’s obligation to make rent payments to the joint powers agency does not itself constitute a debt requiring voter approval. We also conclude that the law governing joint powers agencies gives these…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Johnson v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Morse v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. United Airlines, Inc. v. Hsbc Bank Usa, N.A., as Trustee, and California Statewide Communities Development AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Padres L.P. v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Traders Sports, Inc. v. City of San LeandroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. GnassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API