Legal Opinion
Vurpillat v. Zehner
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 1, 1891No. 360PublishedCited by 5 opinions
From the Cass Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
The appellees sued the appellants on an attachment bond given in an action before a justice of the peace. A trial by the court resulted in a finding for the appellees, on which judgment was rendered, a motion for a new trial made by the appellants having been overruled.
A question is presented relating to the exclusion of evidence offered by the appellants.
One of the appellants, who was a plaintiff in the attachment suit, was a witness. He was asked to state “ what the *398fact is as to one of the plaintiffs in this suit being a nonresident of the State of Indiana at the time you commenced your…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Higham v. VanosdolIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Judy v. CitizenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Trentman v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Sohn v. JervisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ashland Oil, Inc. v. ArnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- National Surety Co. v. JeanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- Jansen v. PollastrineDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1942
- Lewis v. State ex rel. DailyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Ashland Oil, Inc. v. ArnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986