Legal Opinion

Trentman v. Wiley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9221PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C.

The appellees sued the appellants upon an undertaking in attachment, alleging in their complaint, in substance, that appellants executed said bond, caused a writ of attachment to issue thereon, by virtue of which a stock of goods of the value of $2,000, belonging to the appellees, was attached, sold and otherwise disposed of, whereby the same was wholly lost to the appellees; that they were put to $300 expense in defending said attachment proceedings, and that a judgment was finally rendered for them therein.

A demurrer to the complaint by appellants for the want of facts was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCallister v. MountIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Beals v. GuernseyNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  3. Smith v. ZentIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Moore v. LynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Lexington & Big Sandy Railroad v. Ford Plate Glass Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sturgis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Buchanan v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HubbardIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Lehman v. HawksIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API