Legal Opinion

Lewis v. State ex rel. Daily

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1892No. 628PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Jackson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellant was prosecuted under the statute relating to bastardy. His motion for a new trial was overruled. The testimony was conflicting. Therefore we can not disturb the result reached in the trial court because of alleged insufficiency of evidence.

Two rulings of the court rejecting offers of proof are assigned as causes in the motion for a new trial.

It does not appear in either case that any question was asked the witness in relation to the matter embraced in the offer, and it does not appear to what facts the witness would have testified in either instance.

When it is intended to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Higham v. VanosdolIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Judy v. CitizenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Vurpillat v. ZehnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lauter v. DuckworthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Russell v. StonerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API