Jansen v. Pollastrine

PRATT, District Judge.

In cause No. 4280 in this Court, wherein J. B. Pollastrine was plaintiff and Joseph M. Jansen was defendant, a trial was had, and at the end of plaintiff’s testimony the Court granted a nonsuit on motion of the defendant and dismissed the action for the reason that the plaintiff had not proved any cause of action. .

*318In said cause No. 4280, plaintiff Pollastrine caused an attachment writ to issue and be levied upon the property of the defendant Jansen.

In the present suit Jansen, as plaintiff, alleges the above-mentioned levy of the attachment upon his property and damages…