Legal Opinion

Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. Cohen

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1983No. Civ. 62372PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEBRON, J. *

This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings, a partial summary judgment and a nonsuit rendered by two departments—one a law and motion department and the other a trial department. In this appeal we are concerned only with the rulings of the law and motion department and the trial department relative to appellant’s third, fourth and fifth causes of action.

The issue which underpins all three causes of action here involved may be generally stated as follows: Given the facts of this case, does a former partner of a partnership at will owe any fiduciary duty to former…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Howard v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Kimmel v. GolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API