Legal Opinion
Clarke v. Fiedler
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 1941No. Civ. 12392PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Plaintiffs by their complaint filed herein alleged that in the year 1938 and up to June 27th thereof, they were operating a public soft baseball park in the city of Santa Monica; that on or about J une 1st, they were solicited by defendant, through the latter’s agent, to purchase an interest in similar baseball parks operated by defendant in the city of Los Angeles; that negotiations were commenced between the parties with a view to combining their joint efforts in the ownership and management of the Los Angeles baseball parks, and that at defendant’s suggestion and with his consent,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Pratt v. . Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Jones v. CloverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Wyman v. Monolith Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Uzyel v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Hatch's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Ersa Grae Corp. v. Fluor Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.