Legal Opinion

Stockton Dry Goods Co. v. Girsh

California Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1951No. Sac. 6084PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff as lessor brought an action against the defendant lessee for declaratory relief pursuant to section 1060 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The existence of a controversy was alleged and placed in issue by the defendant’s answer. The trial court found that a controversy existed as to a proper construction of the terms of the lease, and basing its findings on stipulated facts and the language of the lease, rendered judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed.

The plaintiff owns a department store in the city of Stockton. For about 20 years prior to March, 1944, one Ben…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Cousins Investment Co. v. Hastings Clothing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Keating v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Percoff v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Lippman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Milton v. Hudson Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API