Agar v. Winslow
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
This is an unlawful detainer case. The defendant Winslow appeals from a judgment against him for the possession of the property and for one thousand dollars’ rents unpaid, so far as said judgment awards to plaintiffs said sum of one thousand dollars, and from an order denying said defendant’s motion for a new trial.
Joseph Macdonough, being the owner of the premises in controversy, made a will in which he appointed the plaintiffs herein as his executors and trustees; thereafter, in 1895, he died, and plaintiff John G-. Agar was appointed by the court as sole exec*589"utor of his said will,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rodermund v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Bunch v. GraveIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Levitzky v. CanningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Skaggs v. EmersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Leadbeater v. RothIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Herdan v. HansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Zimmerman v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Capogeannis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Davis v. WestphalMontana Supreme Court · 2017
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.