Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Micka

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 4, 1964No. 39414PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing with prejudice an equitable action to restrain performance of an alleged illegal contract by municipal officials of the village of Hibbing. The Water, Light, Power and Building Commission of the village of Hibbing proposes to purchase a new 7,500 kilowatt generator and auxiliary equipment, costing in the neighborhood of $700,000, and pay for it out of the commission’s Reserve for Replacement Fund. Appellants contend that the proposed acquisition is an “expansion, extension, addition, change, modification or improvement” of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. Franklin CountyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. City of Los Angeles v. County of MonoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Dale Ex Rel. Smith v. PushorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. City of Pasadena v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Envall v. Independent School District No. 704Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Shea v. Hanna Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Galob v. SanbornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. BRIDGEWATER TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. v. City of MonticelloCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API