Legal Opinion

Dale Ex Rel. Smith v. Pushor

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1956No. 36,588PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

In an action to set aside the cancellation of a contract for deed, plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant.

This action was originally commenced by Eose T. Dale as plaintiff. Subsequently, Edward A. Smith was appointed general guardian of Eose and he was thereafter substituted as party plaintiff. Unless otherwise indicated, Eose will be described herein as the plaintiff.

This action grows out of the cancellation of a contract for deed. 2 Defendant, Minnie Pushor, and her then husband Clarence, on September 18, 1950, sold and conveyed by contract for deed to Mabel…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Colstad v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Brannan v. ShertzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Lundberg v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Greengard v. FretzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Utecht v. Shopko Department StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. In Re ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Bebo v. DelanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Davis v. Midwest Discount Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Hughes v. MickaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API