Legal Opinion
Galob v. Sanborn
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 19, 1968No. 40686PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Defendant village of Hibbing, by and through its Public Utilities Commission, appeals from a money judgment entered against the commission declaring the commission to be a legal entity subject to suit in its own name and liable for the judgment rendered against it.
The action was one for a declaratory judgment seeking a determination that legal services rendered by plaintiff in connection with the case of Hughes v. Micka, 269 Minn. 268, 130 N. W. (2d) 505, were rendered “for the Defendants Micka, Sanborn and Fotopoulos in their behalf as individuals and as Public Utilities…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- City of Seattle Ex Rel. of Dunbar v. DuttonWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Hughes v. MickaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Cremer v. MicheletSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Monfort v. WheelockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hyatt v. Anoka Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center v. MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Galob v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center v. Avera MarshallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Ashley Josie v. City of Princeton and Princeton Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.