City of Los Angeles v. County of Mono
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as the “city”) brought two actions to recover taxes paid under protest to defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “county”). Before paying the taxes, the city made appropriate application to the State Board of Equalization for relief from the assessments, but the board denied any relief. One of the actions was to recover taxes paid on two hydroelectric generating plants and appurtenant works on the Owens River, a transmission line, and a dam on Rush Creek; the other to recover alleged excessive and discriminatory taxes on approximately 20,000…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Covert v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Rock Creek Water District v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- City & County of San Francisco v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. MundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- City & County of San Francisco v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Union Oil Co. v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Michael Todd Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- A. F. Gilmore Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Le Strange v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.