Shea v. Hanna Mining Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This appeal is from an order denying post-trial motions by appellants Joseph M. Shea, George Rapovich, John M. Miller and Raymond J. Gunville for a new trial or amended findings. In August 1982, appellants brought four separate actions alleging that respondent Hanna Mining Company had discriminated against them on the basis of age in violation of Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. 1 (1980).1
In May 1985, the trial court granted Gun-ville’s motion for an advisory jury under Minn.R.Civ.P. 39.02, and reserved ruling on similar motions by the other three appellants. The Gunville case…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Martha D. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Edward ACKERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIAMOND SHAMROCK CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- BE & K. CONST. v. AbbottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Rademacher v. FMC Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- James L. Miller v. Certainteed Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Certainteed Corporation Salaried Employees Pension Plan & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Albertson v. FMC Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Anderson v. Northwestern National Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.