Levine v. American Psychological Ass'n
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on [16] defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims for unjust enrichment and violations of California consumer protection laws. Plaintiffs, on behalf of a proposed class, claim that they paid a “special assessment” or a “practice assessment” to the American Psychological Association (“APA”) for use by its lobbying arm, the American Psychological Association Practice Organization (“APAPO”), under the mistaken belief that payment of that assessment was required for membership in the APA. Compl. [ECF 15] ¶ 22.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- APA Assessment Fee Litigation v. American Psychological Assoc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Levine v. American Psychological Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Ghori-Ahmad v. United States Commission on International Religious FreedomDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- APA Assessment Fee Litigation v. American Psychological Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Peterson v. AT & T Mobility Services, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.