Legal Opinion
Ghori-Ahmad v. United States Commission on International Religious Freedom
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 17, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0936PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion for Partial Dismissal
BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a motion for partial dismissal by Defendant, the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (hereinafter “USCIRF”). See Def.’s Mot., Dkt. #9. Plaintiff Safiya Ghori-Ahmad alleges discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Congressional Accountability Act (“CAA”), 2 U.S.C. § 1301 et seq. GhoriAhmad also brings a claim for detrimental reliance. USCIRF moves to dismiss the detrimental reliance claim, the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Art and Drama Therapy Institute, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Sharma v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Desta v. PompeoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Shawarma Stackz LLC v. JwadDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022