Legal Opinion
APA Assessment Fee Litigation v. American Psychological Ass'n
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 1, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2010-1780PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Ellen G. Levine, Ruth Fallenbaum, and Eric S. Engum, on behalf of a proposed class, seek to file a fifth amended complaint. They claim that they paid a “special assessment” or a “practice assessment” to the American Psychological Association (“APA”) for use by its lobbying arm, the American Psychological Association Practice Organization (“APAPO”), under the mistaken belief that payment of that assessment was required for membership in the APA. Defendants APA and APAPO previously moved to dismiss all counts of plaintiffs’ fourth…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- One-O-One Enterprises, Inc. v. Richard E. CarusoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Howard v. Riggs National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Harriet Alicke v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- APA Assessment Fee Litigation v. American Psychological Assoc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Levine v. American Psychological Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015