Legal Opinion

Washington Fish & Oyster Co. v. G. P. Halferty & Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1954No. 32561PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

— Washington Fish & Oyster Co., Inc., brought this action to recover an amount of money alleged to be due under two contracts with G. P. Halferty & Co., Inc. So far as the merits of the controversy are concerned, the principal issue presented, both in the trial court and on appeal, is whether the contracts sued upon were contracts for an outright sale of canned salmon to Halferty Co. or contracts which created an agency relationship between the parties, whereby G. P. Halferty & Co., Inc., was a selling agent or a broker for respondent.

Washington Fish & Oyster Co., Inc., is a large…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Herzog v. HerzogWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Noble v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Ingram v. SausetWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Holt & JefferyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Goshert v. WirthWashington Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hansen v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. Fosbre v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Grant County Constructors v. E. v. Lane Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Beaver v. Estate of HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. St. Yves v. Mid State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API