Legal Opinion

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Codiga

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1923No. Civ. No. 4443PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The defendant was sued on a promissory note and at the time that he appeared in the action he filed a demurrer and moved to change the place of trial of the action from the superior court of the state of California in and for the city and county of San Francisco to the superior court in and for the county of San Joaquin. His motion was denied and the defendant has appealed.

The record does not disclose any points with reference to the form of any paper, nor any question as to procedure, except as to the following matters. In its complaint the plaintiff pleaded an action on a promissory note…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Kanaskat Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Cascade Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Holt & JefferyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Borderre v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Global Packaging, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. General Acceptance Corp. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971
  5. Barnes v. HiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API