Ramming v. Caldwell
Appellate Court of Illinois
In ebbor to the City Court of East St. Louis> Illinois; the Hon. B. H. Caney, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, P. J.
The defendant in error instituted his action of assumpsit against the plaintiff in error in the City Court of East St. Louis. The declaration alleges that in consideration that the plaintiff, Caldwell, would buy of the defendant, Ramming, at his request, certain machinery and merchandise named, and have a man assist in putting the same in a building to be used as a planing mill, said machinery to be placed in said building within a reasonable time, for which the plaintiff was to pay a specified price, and that said machinery was to be in good order and suitable for the purpose for which the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- De Witt v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Walker v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
- Ruff v. JarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Kohl v. LindleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Graham v. EisznerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Holt & JefferyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Ford Motor Co. v. OsburnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
- Lamb v. OttoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Johnson v. CardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- American Paper Co. v. HastingsWashington Supreme Court · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.