Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1910No. Crim. No. 131PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County, and from an order denying a new trial. Henry C. Gesford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of . manslaughter under an information accusing him of the crime of murder.

This .appeal is from the judgment and the order denying defendant a new trial.

The only point made here is on the ruling of the court refusing, it is claimed, to allow the defendant to establish a. foundation for the introduction in evidence of the deposition of a witness taken at the preliminary examination of the charge on which the accused was tried.

Section 686, subdivision 3, of the Penal Code, upon which counsel sought to introduce the evidence of said witness, provides,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Taliaferro v. LockeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Taliaferro v. City of San PabloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. People v. HewittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. People v. HornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API