Legal Opinion

People v. Horn

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1964No. Crim. 88PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

The defendant, James Edward Horn, appeals from convictions on three counts of forgery. The evidence shows that the defendant and James Stanley Mallow, jointly charged with him in the information, and Aubrey Lloyd (“Skeeter”) Johnson, entered into a conspiracy to forge and cash 10 cheeks, the forms of which had been stolen from the B & R Casing Company. The jury’s verdict with respect to the three checks actually forged and uttered is amply supported by the evidence.

There is only one point raised on the appeal—that the court erred in admitting over objection the recorded testimony of the above…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. CarswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. RedstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. People v. CavazosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. NooneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. People v. BenjaminCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. LinderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API