Legal Opinion

People v. Hewitt

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1926No. Docket No. 888PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The accused was convicted in the superior court in and for the county of Sacramento of the crime of robbery. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The point first urged for a reversal is that the information upon which the defendant was tried and convicted is “fatally defective” in that it does not describe with sufficient particularity or definiteness the character of the property alleged to have been taken by the defendant or state its value. The information is as follows:

“The said J. Hewitt on or about the 2nd day of May A. D. 1925, in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Baker v. JosephCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. People v. CavazosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. VaughanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API