People v. Ramos
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment upon a verdict of conviction of the crime of grand larceny. The motion of the defendant for a new trial was denied.
The point urged upon appeal is that the court erred in allowing the district attorney to read to the jury the transcript of the testimony of the prosecuting witness which was taken in the police court upon the preliminary examination. The respondent contends that the transcript of this testimony was admissible under the provisions of section 686 of the Penal Code, for the reason that the witness could not be found within the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Baker v. JosephCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. WittyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. LeavensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Renton, Holmes, & Co. v. MonnierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. SchwarzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. BernsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. LandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. FayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.