Legal Opinion

Taliaferro v. City of San Pablo

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1960No. Civ. 18944PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

Plaintiff appeals from judgment in favor of defendant district attorney after sustaining of the latter’s demurrer to the fourth amended complaint without leave to amend.

The complaint is in ten counts. It charges that electrical and plumbing contractors and unions have unlawfully combined to restrain trade so as to restrict plaintiff from directly employing journeymen to make repairs upon apartment houses owned by him, and seeks injunction and double damages under the Cartwright Act. It also seeks to enjoin enforcement of the building code ordinance of the city of San Pablo, and to compel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Supervisors v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Boyne v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Taliaferro v. LockeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. PollockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Campbell v. MoskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. BrighamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Gananian v. WagstaffeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API