Legal Opinion

South Central Coast Regional Commission v. Charles A. Pratt Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1982No. Civ. 5645PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, Acting P. J.—

Introduction

The basic question posed by this appeal is at what point in the subdivision process does a subdivider acquire a vested right to complete his subdivision without a permit from the California Coastal Commission, We hold that a vested right to an exemption from the permit requirements of the coastal act (Pub. Resources Code, § 30000 et seq.) arises only when the subdivider is entitled to final map approval according to the requirements of the California Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code, § 66410 et seq.). This means the subdivider must satisfy all conditions…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Youngblood v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Anderson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Aries Development Co. v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Feduniak v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Landgate, Inc. v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Santa Monica Pines, Ltd. v. Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. CMC of Nevada, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Lakeview Development Corp. v. City of South Lake TahoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API