Legal Opinion
Anderson v. City Council
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 10, 1964No. Civ. 21603PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, P. J.
Plaintiff William Anderson, Stanford Holmgren, Jack Looney and Harold Smith instituted this proceeding against defendants, The City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, and its members, to obtain a peremptory writ of mandate compelling the issuance of a land use permit and a building permit to construct a gasoline service station.
On November 7, 1960, Smith entered into a written agreement to purchase a parcel of real property from Charles Benson for the sum of $30,000, subject to the express condition that Smith was able to have the property rezoned so as to allow the construction thereon of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Brougher v. Board of Public Works of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- HFH, LTD. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Russian Hill Improvement Ass'n v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.