Legal Opinion

Landgate, Inc. v. California Coastal Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1998No. S059847PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1010Opinion

MOSK, J.

In First Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County (1987) 482 U.S. B04, 321 [107 S.Ct. 2378, 2389, 96 L.Ed.2d 250],1 the court held that “where the government’s activities have already worked a taking of all use of property, no subsequent action by the government can relieve it of the duty to provide compensation for the period during which a taking was effective.” In so holding, the court cautioned that the holding did not extend to “the quite different questions that would arise in the case of normal delays in obtaining building permits, changes in zoning ordinances, variances,…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. San Remo Hotel L.P. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Galland v. City of ClovisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API