Legal Opinion
Santa Monica Pines, Ltd. v. Rent Control Board
California Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1984No. Docket Nos. L.A. 31615, 31616PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
Appellants, the owners and prospective owner of a 42-unit apartment building in the City of Santa Monica,1 appeal from a judgment upholding the city’s denial of their claim of a vested right to remove the apartments from the rental housing market by converting the apartments to condominiums, without obtaining a permit for such removal under Santa Monica’s rent control law. Appellants rest their claim on the city’s approval of a tentative subdivision map for the conversion prior to the adoption of the rent control charter amendment, and their alleged subsequent expenditure of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- E. L. White, Inc. v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Youngblood v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Flynn v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- B & P DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. City of SaratogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Griffin Development Co. v. City of OxnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Russ Building Partnership v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- City of West Hollywood v. Beverly Towers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.