Legal Opinion

Lakeview Development Corp. v. City of South Lake Tahoe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 28, 1990No. 89-15214PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff Lakeview Development Corporation (Lakeview) appeals from the district court’s entry of judgment against it on four claims, the first of which asks for a declaration that Lakeview has a “vested right" to complete the construction of a townhouse development, and the other three of which ask for injunctive relief and damages to redress the alleged deprivation of Lakeview’s right to the economically viable use of its land. We affirm the district court’s judgment on all four claims, albeit for reasons different from those stated by the district court.

I

FACTS

In…

2Cases cited27 opinions

Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

Outdoor Media Group, Inc. v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
Aurelia SCHOLAR, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. PACIFIC BELL, a Pacific Telesis Company, a Corporation, Defendant/AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
Thomas Dodd and Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
General Auto Service Station v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
Petra Presbyterian Church v. Village of NorthbrookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.