Legal Opinion
Aries Development Co. v. California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 1975No. Docket Nos. 13781, 13818PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAMURA, J.
These are appeals from actions of the superior court on a petition for writ of mandate filed by Aries Development Company (Aries) to review and set aside a decision of the California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission (Commission) denying Aries’ claim of exemption from the permit requirements of the California Coastal Zone Conservation Act of 1972 (Coastal Act).
*538The Commission appeals from a judgment granting Aries a peremptory writ of mandate commanding the Commission to enter a decision recognizing Aries’ claim of exemption. Richard E. Charles and Ruth J. Charles (the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Scott v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission v. Town of EmeryvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Hittle v. Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. Main San Gabriel Basin WatermasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Mixon v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.