Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Leisure
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 2005No. OSB 02-149, 02-150, 03-31; SC S51514PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) alleges that the accused violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules (DR) 1 by writing numerous checks that, when she wrote them, her checking account could not cover. Based on that conduct, and its effect on two creditors in particular, the Bar charged that the accused had violated DR 1-102(A)(2) (engaging in criminal conduct reflecting adversely on a lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness to practice law) and DR 1-102(A)(3) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KimmellOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RenshawOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HermanOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- In re HermanOregon Supreme Court · 2015