Bishop v. McKillican
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a new trial. John Ells-worth, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
In 1890 the Consolidated Piedmont Cable Company, a corporation operating a street railroad in .Oakland, executed a mortgage to the California Title Insurance and Trust Company, by its terms including all track and tracks, together with all depot grounds, buildings, machinery, workshops, dummies, cars, rolling stock of all kinds, full equipments, tools, fixtures, and other property, which is now or may hereafter, in whole or in part, be constructed, completed, purchased, acquired, *323held, or owned by the mortgagor, pertaining to the said railroads, and all the corporate rights, privileges, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoyle v. Plattsburgh & Montreal RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Simpson v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. Fichtenkamm v. GambsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- California Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Consolidated Piedmont Cable Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Tibbets v. G. Cohn & Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Morand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Rolando v. EverettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Booth v. Central Savings BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914