Legal Opinion
Morand v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 3, 1974No. Docket Nos. 34304, 34493PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
We have consolidated for hearing and decision two closely related applications for relief by way of mandate. They deal with the power of the superior courts to appoint receivers in aid of execution, and the power of such receivers to commence actions in relation to the receivership.
It has been a long standing judicial practice, in proper cases, to appoint receivers in proceedings variously called “in aid of execution,” “supplemental proceedings,” “creditors’ suits,” and “creditors’ bills.” The purpose of such proceedings is to reach property of a judgment debtor which may…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bruton v. TearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Cohen v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Dabney Oil Co. v. Providence Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- In Re FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Scott v. HollingsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cal-American Income Property Fund VII v. Brown Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Baron v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- In Re Oak Park Calabasas Condominium Ass'nUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Downtown Sunnyvale Residential v. Wells Fargo Bank CA6California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Lee v. Wien Bakery CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.