California Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Consolidated Piedmont Cable Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County directing the payment of money by a receiver. A. L. Frick, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
In November, 1893, the above-named plaintiff brought an action against the defendant, the Consolidated Piedmont Cable Company, to foreclose a mortgage made by defendant upon its property, consisting of real estate, buildings, franchises, street railway, cars, machinery, etc.
*238The court, on the application of plaintiff, appointed Ira Bishop receiver of the mortgaged property, to take possession thereof, and to maintain and operate the railway pending the action, and until final decree. Bishop qualified as receiver, took possession of and operated the railway until March 19, 1895.
A…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- Donald J. v. Evna M.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Fairchild v. Gray, New York County Courts1930
- Turner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Binney v. San Dimas Lemon Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bishop v. McKillicanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899