Tibbets v. G. Cohn & Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. A. A. Sander-son, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This action was brought to recover the value of certain property alleged to have been transferred to defendants within one month before the com*366mencement of proceedings in insolvency, in violation of the Insolvency Act. In the complaint it is averred that on the nineteenth day of May, 1892, one Charles W. Pick, being insolvent, filed his petition alleging.his insolvency, and praying to be discharged from his liabilities; that such proceedings were had that plaintiff was, on August 24, 1892, appointed receiver of the estate of said insolvent pending the election of an assignee. Facts are then…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex parte HollisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Francisco v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Swamp and Overflowed Land Dis. No. 110 v. FeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Wilhoit v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allen v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- Morand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Bishop v. McKillicanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899