Pugh v. Cook
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is taken from the trial court’s rejection of appellants’ claim of two easements across appellees’ land and the court’s ruling that a “Well Agreement” between the parties was dissolved.
Stewart Title & Trust Company, as trustee, and Hildegarde Cook, as beneficiary, owned a 163-acre parcel of land in the Empire Mountains south of Tucson. In 1976, 22.8 acres were sold to appellees. The deed conveying the land provided that the interest of appellees was subject to “[established and/or existing roads, roadways and highways.” At the time of the conveyance, there…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Koonce v. Brite EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Whittemore v. AmatorArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Evanik v. JanusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- STATE BY AND THROUGH MONTANA, ETC. v. CroninMontana Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- A.R. Teeters & Associates, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Callender v. Transpacific Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Evergreen West, Inc. v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Chancy and Kim Wheeldon v. Elk Feed Grounds House, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.