Evanik v. Janus

PRESIDING JUSTICE MILLS

delivered the opinion of the court:

An easement?

The trial court said, “No.”

We affirm.

The Evaniks brought an action seeking a mandatory injunction, declaratory judgment and damages resulting from the alleged obstruction of an easement across the Janus’ property.

The trial court entered judgment for defendants across the board-denied injunction, denied existence of an easement, refused damages.

The circuit court was right.

I. The Facts

This case concerns two parcels of land in Macoupin County which share a common boundary. (To aid the reader, a map of the land in question in…