Legal Opinion

A.R. Teeters & Associates, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 20, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 88-579PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TAYLOR, Judge.

A.R. Teeters & Associates (“Associates”) and Arlen R. Teeters (“Teeters”) appeal three judgments based on jury verdicts in favor of Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”). Associates raises the following two issues: (1) whether the jury verdict in favor of Kodak on Associates’ breach of contract claim is supported by the evidence; and (2) whether Associates, owned and managed by the same people as a predecessor company and serving the same customers with a similar product, is liable to Kodak, the product supplier, for all of the predecessor company’s debts under the doctrine of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wood v. DummerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1824
  3. Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Schade v. DiethrichArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. American Railway Express Company v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1920

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Ed Peters Jewelry Co. v. C & J Jewelry Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. Oney v. Weinberg (In Re Wienberg)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Miller v. HehlenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. Winsor v. Glasswerks PHX, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API