Legal Opinion

STATE BY AND THROUGH MONTANA, ETC. v. Cronin

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1978No. 14037PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

Plaintiff State Fish and Game Commission appeals from a judgment of the Gallatin County District Court decreeing an easement over their land in favor of the public and defendant Cronin and enjoining plaintiff from interfering with it. Defendant Cronin cross-appeals for costs, damages, and attorney fees.

Plaintiff and defendant Cronin own adjoining properties situated in Township Seven South, Range Four East, Gallatin County, Montana. Plaintiff, owns % of Section Seventeen (“plaintiff’s parcel”) which is flanked on the east by Highway 191 and on the west by Section 18 of which defendant owns…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thisted v. Country Club Tower Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Wilson v. ChestnutMontana Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Kostbade v. MetierMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  4. O'CONNOR v. BrodieMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Cope v. CopeMontana Supreme Court · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Graham v. MacKMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Medhus v. DutterMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kelly v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Leisz v. Avista Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Yellowstone River, LLC v. Meriwether Land Fund I, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API