Legal Opinion

Koonce v. Brite Estate

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1984No. C-2396PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Justice.

The Estate of J.E. Brite, acting by and through its Successor Administrator, filed suit to obtain a declaratory judgment establishing an implied easement by necessity across land owned by Genevieve Koonce, wife of Phil Koonce. The trial court rendered judgment awarding the Brite Estate an easement across Mrs. Koonce’s property, and the court of appeals affirmed. 655 S.W.2d 329. We reverse those judgments and render judgment that the J.E. Brite Estate take nothing.

The Estate of J.E. Brite is the owner of a ten acre tract landlocked from public access. This acreage is part of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bains v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Duff v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Mitchell v. CastellawTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Persons v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Koonce v. J.E. Brite EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Scott v. Cannon, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  2. Holden v. Weidenfeller, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  3. MacK v. Landry, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  4. Roberson v. City of Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  5. Scown v. Neie, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2006

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API