Taylor v. Order of Railway Conductors
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for' Stearns county, Searle, J., denying a motion to vacate and set aside the service of the summons in the action.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
The summons and complaint in this action were served upon one of the members of the organization known as the “Order of Railway Conductors of America.” There was a special appearance, and motion to set aside the service, which was overruled. From this order defendant appeals.
The facts essential to the question thus presented appear in the complaint and affidavits upon which the motion was heard, by the trial court. It is set forth in the complaint that the defendant is an association doing business under the name of the “Order of Railway Conductors,” and has maintained a mutual benefit…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cornfield v. Order Brith AbrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Dimond v. Minnesota Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Gale v. TownsendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Yanish v. Pioneer Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jardine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- St. Paul Typothetæ v. St. Paul Bookbinders' Union No. 37Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Bowers v. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Fitzpatrick v. International Typographical UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.