Gale v. Townsend
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action to determine adverse claims to real property in Minneapolis, brought in the district court for Hennepin county against Ervin D. Townsend and Mary, his wife, and “also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, .lien, or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein.”
Read the full summary
Action to determine adverse claims to real property in Minneapolis, brought in the district court for Hennepin county against Ervin D. Townsend and Mary, his wife, and “also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, .lien, or interest in the real estate described in the complaint herein.” An answer to the complaint was interposed by Emilia A. Townsend and others, alleging title in themselves as heirs-at-law- of Ervin D., who died intestate and leaving no widow, on March-13, 1875. At the trial before Hooker, J., it appeared, and the court found, that the. premises…
1Opinion of the Court
Gilfillan, C. J.1
In 1858, Morris Lamprey and John W. Hurd brought an action in the district of Bamsey county on a promissory note, the defendants being described in the summons and complaint as “JDavison, Perkins & Co., doing business under the common name of Davison, Perkins & Co.” The complaint alleged that the defendants, whose individual names are unknown to plaintiffs, are a firm, whose firm and common name was Davison, Perkins & Co. An affidavit of service was made by S. C. Gale, to the effect that he served a true copy of the summons on John G. Sherburne, C. D. Davison, John S. Mann,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Bloom v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Dimond v. Minnesota Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Taylor v. Order of Railway ConductorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Dimond v. Minnesota Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.