Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1933No. Nos. 29,185, 29,186, 29,187PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

These three actions were considered together in the lower court. In each defendant appeared “specially and not generally, and for the sole purpose of questioning the jurisdiction of the court over the person of said defendant, and for the purpose of having the pretended service of the summons and complaint on said defendant adjudged null and void and in all things vacated and set aside.” A notice of motion was served in each, supported by petition and affidavit. There was a counter affidavit on behalf of each plaintiff. The motions of defendant were in all things denied, and appeals taken to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'n v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Specht v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Taylor v. Order of Railway ConductorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Operative Plasterers' & Cement Finishers' International Ass'n v. CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  2. DeKeyser v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Couch v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Spica v. International Ladies Garment Workers' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 516 v. Santa Fe Packing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API