Dimond v. Minnesota Savings Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Kelly, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The complaint purports to set forth a cause of action against certain parties to the plaintiff unknown, who were associated and doing business under the common name of the Minnesota Savings Bank; that he deposited in the bank conducted by such associates certain money, which has not been repaid; and demands judgment against the Minnesota Savings Bank and each of the defendants for the amount thereof. The summons and complaint were served upon Max Toltz. The proof of service states that he is a defendant in the action. He appeared in the action, and interposed a demurrer, which was in these…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gale v. TownsendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jardine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- St. Paul Typothetæ v. St. Paul Bookbinders' Union No. 37Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Bloom v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Peterson v. W. Davis & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Taylor v. Order of Railway ConductorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.