Legal Opinion

Yoak v. Ide

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2004No. 03-57, 03-68PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶ 1] The primary issue in these combined appeals is the validity of a governmental claim. We affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the appellees and dismissing the appellant’s complaint, and we find the appellees’ collateral estoppel and res judicata issues to be moot. 1

ISSUES

1. Did the appellant’s Notice of Claim meet the constitutional requirements for a valid governmental claim?

2. Is the appellant’s Notice of Claim saved by the doctrine of substantial compliance?

3. Does an invalid Notice of Claim deprive the district court of subject matter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Duncan v. Afton, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Amrein v. Wyoming Livestock BoardWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Darrar v. BourkeWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Anita Harmon, as an Individual and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Euella PotterWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Bell v. SchellWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Wooster v. Carbon County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Cantrell v. Sweetwater County School District No. 2Wyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Wilson v. Town of AlpineWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API