Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Town of Alpine

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2005No. 04-167PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVoigt, Justice

[¶ 1] The district court dismissed this negligence action because the appellants’ notice of governmental claim did not meet constitutional requirements. We dismiss this appeal for the same reason.

ISSUES

1. Did the district court have subject matter jurisdiction over the claim?

2. Was the appellee barred by the equitable doctrine of either estoppel or laches from asserting the lack of subject matter jurisdiction?

*291FACTS

[¶2] On July 2, 1998, while staying in Alpine, Wyoming, Lisa Wilson allegedly contracted e-coli poisoning and Hemolytic-Ur-emic Syndrome by drinking water from the Town of Alpine’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. CaseyWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. McLean v. Hyland Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bell v. SchellWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Wooster v. Carbon County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Anita Harmon, as an Individual and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Euella PotterWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Ecosystem Resources, L.C. v. Broadbent Land & Resources, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. McCann v. City of CodyWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Cantrell v. Sweetwater County School District No. 2Wyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Sky Harbor Air Service, Inc., a Wyoming Corporation, and H. Paul Martin v. Cheyenne Regional Airport Board, a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API