Darrar v. Bourke
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Chief Justice.
Judith Ann Darrar (Darrar) and her husband, 1 Dickson Darrar, appeal the district court’s decision to dismiss their negligence claims, filed pursuant to the Wyoming Governmental Claims Act, against Michael Bourke and Michael Wyatt (officers). The district court determined the officers were entitled to qualified immunity and dismissed the claims against the officers. The City of Sheridan (Sheridan) appeals the district court’s refusal to dismiss Darrar’s claims against it. The two appeals were consolidated for purposes of briefing and oral argument.
We affirm the district…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- TM v. NoblittMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- DeWald v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Patel v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Board of County Commissioners Ex Rel. Teton County Sheriff's Department v. BassettWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Kanzler v. RennerWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Natrona County v. BlakeWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Bird v. RozierWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.