Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Afton, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1999No. 99-24PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

A company and its employee were hired to collect a urine specimen in the first phase of a substance abuse testing program implemented by Solvay Minerals (Solvay) for its employees. In this case of first impression for Wyoming, we must decide whether the collecting company and its employee owe a duty of reasonable care to Solvay’s employee who is required to submit a urine specimen. The district court ruled that, until it had direction from this Court, it would not hold that Wyoming law recognized such a duty; consequently, the district court dismissed the complaint containing…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  5. SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Sharpe v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Landon v. Kroll Laboratory Specialists, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Mission Petroleum Carriers, Inc. v. SolomonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Pehle v. Farm Bureau Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Cox v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API